woodbridge township school district substitute teacher

Plaintiff also alleges that Defendants made defamatory statements in violation of the common law and Plaintiff’s due process rights, and asserts claims for violation of his First Amendment rights to Freedom of Speech and Academic Freedom. Plaintiff further alleges that Defendants failed to provide him with sufficient notice of his rights in 1 connection with his termination under the Open Public Meetings Act and the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Plaintiff alleges that Defendants unlawfully terminated his employment because of his race and religion. BACKGROUND This employment dispute raises the question of whether a teacher can be terminated for allowing access to repugnant, anti-Semitic, and inflammatory media as part of a high school history lesson on the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001. The sole surviving claim is remanded to the New Jersey Superior Court for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. ARLEO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court by way of a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Woodbridge Township Board of Education, Woodbridge Township School District (collectively, “Woodbridge” or the “District”), Superintendent Robert Zega (“Zega”), and Principal Glenn Lottman (“Lottman” or when referenced collectively with Woodbridge and Zega, “Defendants”), against Plaintiff Jason Mostafa Ali (“Ali” or “Plaintiff”). OPINION WOODBRIDGE TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Defendants.

32 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JASON MOSTAFA ALI, Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

WOODBRIDGE TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT et al Doc.

Woodbridge township school district substitute teacher